How Do You Know if Ea Case Was Submitted
BREAKING – Iii studies published by the CDC, UK Government & Oxford University find the Covid-nineteen Vaccines do not work
A graduate of Yale University who also obtained a PHD at Princeton University and an MD degree from the John Hopkins Academy School of Medicine has published a newspaper in which she concludes that mandating the public to take a vaccine is a harmful and dissentious act because of excellent scientific inquiry papers which clearly demonstrate the vaccines exercise not prevent infection or transmission of Covid-nineteen.
Nina Pierpont (MD, PhD) published a paper on September 9th analysing diverse studies that were published in August 2021 which show the alleged Delta Covid-nineteen variant is evading the current Covid-nineteen injections on offering and therefore practice not prevent infection or transmission of Covid-19.
The Doctor of Medicine explained in her published paper that vaccines aim to achieve two ends –
- Protect the vaccinated person against the disease
- Keep vaccinated people from conveying the infection and transmitting it to others.
However, the Dr. of Medicine writes that herd amnesty will not exist reached through vaccination considering new research in multiple settings shows that the alleged Delta variant produces very high viral loads which are just as high in the vaccinated population compared to the unvaccinated population.
Therefore, co-ordinate to Nina Pierpont (MD, PhD), vaccine mandates; such as the one at present enforced in the UK for all Care Home staff, have no justification because vaccinating individuals does not finish or even wearisome the spread of the declared dominant Delta Covid-xix variant.
Which leads the Doctor of Medicine to conclude that natural immunity is much more protective than vaccination because all severities of Covid-19 illness produce salubrious levels of natural immunity.
Nine Pierpont (Physician, PhD) cites three studies whose findings and data back up her conclusions and these include a study published Baronial sixth 2021 in the Centre for Disease Command'south (CDC) 'Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Study', another written report published August 10th 2021 past Oxford University, and a final report published August 24th 2021 which was funded by the UK Department for Health and Social Care.
CDC Written report
The CDC written report focused on 469 cases among Massachusetts residents who attended indoor and outdoor public gatherings over a 2 week period. The results found that 346 of the cases were amidst vaccinated residents with 74% of them presenting with alleged Covid-xix symptoms, and ane.2% being hospitalised.
However the remaining 123 cases were among the unvaccinated population with only i person being hospitalised (0.8%. No deaths occurred in either group. The written report besides found that viral loads were found to be very similar among the vaccinated and unvaccinated, pregnant they were equally infectious.
Oxford University Report
The Oxford University study examined 900 hospital staff members in Vietnam who had been vaccinated with the Oxford / AstraZeneca viral vector injection between March and April 2021. The unabridged hospital staff tested negative for the Covid-xix virus in mid May 2021 yet, the first example among the vaccinated staff members was discovered on June 11th.
All 900 hospital staff were so retested for the Covid-19 virus and 52 additional cases were identified immediately, forcing the infirmary into lockdown. Over the next two weeks, 16 additional cases were identified.
The study found that 76% of the Covid-xix positive staff developed respiratory symptoms, with iii staff members developing pneumonia and one staff member requiring 3 days of oxygen therapy. Peak viral loads amid the fully vaccinated infected group were plant to exist 251 times college than acme viral loads found among the staff in March – Apr 2020 when they were not vaccinated.
UK Department of Health & Social Care Study
The UK Department of Health & Social Care study is an assay of ongoing population broad SARS-CoV-2 monitoring in the UK and includes measures of viral load among the population.
The report constitute that viral loads among the vaccinated and unvaccinated population are virtually the same, and much college than had been recorded prior to the Covid-19 injection roll-out. The written report also found that the majority of cases among the vaccinated population were presenting with symptoms when they became positive.
The authors of the report conclude that the Pfizer and Oxford / AstraZeneca injection accept lost efficacy against what they claim to be the Delta Covid-19 variant, but they maintain that they are essentially effective at keeping people from becoming infected with the Delta variant in the range of 67% to 80%.
Ix Pierpont (MD, PhD) rightly asks in her paper how they can conclude this when 82% of the random sample of new positive PCR tests in the report were fully vaccinated people.
The Doctor of Medicine writes –
'If a vaccine reduces the risk of becoming infected past two-thirds (67%), we would expect the proportion of vaccinated in the positive sample to exist less than the proportion of vaccinated in the population.
Say nosotros get-go with 1000 people in the land, of whom we will randomly sample 100. The country is 80% vaccinated. This means that in our sample of 100 we take fourscore vaccinated and 20 unvaccinated people.
Let's say that the virus has infected 10% of the people across the sampling period, or 10 total cases. If 8 of the infected are among the vaccinated, and 2 in the unvaccinated (lxxx% and 20% of the positives, matching the ratio of vaccinated and unvaccinated in the population), the vaccine has made no difference in whether i tin get infected (0% efficacy). If the vaccine is 67% effective, the cases in the vaccinated grouping would be reduced by 2/3 to 2.67 cases, and the total cases would be but 4.67 cases (two.67 vaccinated and 2 unvaccinated).
This means that simply two.67/4.67 or 57% of the cases would exist in the vaccinated grouping, and 43% in the unvaccinated. (We can get back to 10% overall existence positive but using ratios, yielding v.7 cases amidst the vaccinated and 4.iii amidst the unvaccinated.)
This is why the proportion vaccinated in the infected sample, very close to the proportions vaccinated in the total population, are incompatible with the efficacy numbers generated by the authors.
It appears to me—as in the Massachusetts study—that the vaccine is not decreasing susceptibility to infection at all, and is in reality somewhere between slightly (insignificantly) decreasing susceptibility and slightly increasing susceptibility to the Delta variant.
The Uk study is clear that viral load (and thus infectiousness to others) is much greater with Delta than with Alpha, and that, with Delta, viral load and infectiousness are equal in vaccinated and unvaccinated infected people.'
The above three studies atomic number 82 Nina Pierpont (Medico, PhD) to conclude in her paper that mandating others to take a vaccine is a potentially harmful, damaging human action.
She writes that since the main reason of a mandate is to protect others from infection, and these studies prove across a shadow of a uncertainty that they do non practice this, those who mandate the Covid-xix injections may wish to seek legal counsel regarding their culpability and liability for potential long-lasting harm to those whom they pressure into vaccination with the threat of exclusion from employment, education or society.
Source: https://dailyexpose.uk/2021/09/12/three-studies-find-the-covid-19-vaccines-do-not-work/
0 Response to "How Do You Know if Ea Case Was Submitted"
Post a Comment